![Thungs of hindustsan dual audio](https://kumkoniak.com/36.jpg)
![thungs of hindustsan dual audio thungs of hindustsan dual audio](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-zAxr4r72ogI/W86yCwHy6GI/AAAAAAAAKj8/WlGKCvB64wgTM6k9eqDlHFKHfS2QLFRtgCLcBGAs/w680/Nanu%2BKi%2BJaanu%2B2018%2BHD%2BMovies%2BFree%2BDownload%2B720p%2BHDRip%2B1.4GB.jpg)
I cant believe this is the film that everyone is bashing left right and center. I will write a detailed note on the film later, but either i saw a very different film than the others or i have completely lost it. We know she will never deceive us by slipping into character. That explains the audience’s trust in her. Has she ever tried to sell herself as anything but the Indo-Brit that she is? Whether playing Meera Thapar in Jab Tak Hai Jaan or Supriya Menon in Balram vs Tharadas, she makes sure we know she’s just hopped off an intercontinental flight.
![thungs of hindustsan dual audio thungs of hindustsan dual audio](http://sth.india.com/hindi/sites/default/files/2015/07/21/83055-60562-speaker.jpg)
Yes, I admit Random Rebels in Raunakpur doesn’t quite have the stentorian ring of Thugs of Hindostan - still, one must strive for truth in advertising. It’s not as though the film traverses from Kashmir to Kanyakumari, Gujarat to Bengal (though, as we have discussed, Calcutta is name-dropped), amassing “thugs” along the way. So what’s the problem with “Hindostan”? Just that the action is centred on the kingdom of Raunakpur.
![thungs of hindustsan dual audio thungs of hindustsan dual audio](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-PXcZ4cjwoXI/XQ2qfLo5eYI/AAAAAAAAABg/IvCLGVu-2QUJtvwS584Iwl1wXEtN3FrBQCPcBGAYYCw/s1600/FB_IMG_1560253439875.jpg)
What’s that? I’ve meandered from my original aim of explaining why this film’s title is misleading? Forgive me. I wondered if a name change was in order for Nawab: Bray of Bengal. In the film’s closing portions, there’s talk of moving to Calcutta. Firangi Mallah does get around on an ass, named Nawab. In other words, Thugs of Hindostan gives, of all people, Dharmesh Darshan cause to say “I got there first.” Whatever next? An update of Raja Hindustani, set in the pre-Christian era, with Aamir Khan playing a donkey driver? Fast-forward this story - a woman on a mission, aided by two men (one of whom is a rogue) - to the early 2000s, and we get another Aamir Khan starrer: Mela. His mission is to protect Zafira (Fatima Sana Shaikh), a former princess who seeks revenge on a British officer named Clive (Lloyd Owen), who wiped out her family. (The film is set in the early 19th century.) Khudabaksh Azaad, played by Amitabh Bachchan, is more of a warrior-guardian.
![thungs of hindustsan dual audio thungs of hindustsan dual audio](https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-TSILSQgw6oc/W7LwiLmbD2I/AAAAAAAADdg/E8tn9KBAc0Aa9dg2CqqnY88hj2bV0dzXACLcBGAs/s1600/Screenshot_20181002-094132.jpg)
Aamir Khan’s Firangi Mallah is more of a stool pigeon, who earns a living by passing information to the British. Unless you count a small band of thuggees, who rob and kill travellers, the film has no “thugs”. There are three words in the title of Vijay Krishna Acharya’s new film, and at least two of them are wrong. Read the full review on Film Companion, here:
![Thungs of hindustsan dual audio](https://kumkoniak.com/36.jpg)